STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology
How to cite this record FAIRsharing.org: STROBE; STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology; DOI: https://doi.org/10.25504/FAIRsharing.1mk4v9; Last edited: Jan. 8, 2019, 1:34 p.m.; Last accessed: Oct 22 2020 1:15 a.m.
Record updated: July 17, 2018, 10:19 a.m. by The FAIRsharing Team.
Edits to 'https://fairsharing.org/FAIRsharing.1mk4v9' by 'The FAIRsharing Team' at 10:19, 17 Jul 2018 (approved): 'miriam_url' has been modified: Before: None After:
Edits to 'https://fairsharing.org/FAIRsharing.1mk4v9' by 'The FAIRsharing Team' at 00:11, 20 Dec 2016 (approved): 'description' has been modified: Before: STROBE was created by an international, collaborative initiative of epidemiologists, methodologists, statisticians, researchers and journal editors involved in the conduct and dissemination of observational studies, with the common aim of STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology. The STROBE Statement is being endorsed by a growing number of biomedical journals. Incomplete and inadequate reporting of research hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the studies reported in the medical literature. Readers need to know what was planned (and what was not), what was done, what was found, and what the results mean. Recommendations on the reporting of studies that are endorsed by leading medical journals can improve the quality of reporting.Observational research comprises several study designs and many topic areas. We aimed to establish a checklist of items that should be included in articles reporting such research - the STROBE Statement. We considered it reasonable to initially restrict the recommendations to the three main analytical designs that are used in observational research: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We want to provide guidance on how to report observational research well. Our recommendations are not prescriptions for designing or conducting studies. Also, the checklist is not an instrument to evaluate the quality of observational research. After: STROBE was created by an international, collaborative initiative of epidemiologists, methodologists, statisticians, researchers and journal editors involved in the conduct and dissemination of observational studies, with the common aim of STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology.
No XSD schemas defined
Conditions of Use
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
von Elm E,Altman DG,Egger M,Pocock SJ,Gotzsche PC,Vandenbroucke JP
J Clin Epidemiol 2008
The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement.
Sharp MK,Utrobicic A,Gomez G,Cobo E,Wager E,Hren D
BMJ Open 2017
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): An Extension of the STROBE Statement.
Lachat C,Hawwash D,Ocke MC,Berg C,Forsum E,Hornell A,Larsson C,Sonestedt E,Wirfalt E,Akesson A,Kolsteren P,Byrnes G,De Keyzer W,Van Camp J,Cade JE,Slimani N,Cevallos M,Egger M,Huybrechts I
PLoS Med 2016
No semantic standards defined
Models and Formats
No syntax standards defined
No identifier schema standards defined
No metrics standards defined
No Related Databases
This record is in need of a maintainer. If you login, you'll be able to claim this record.
European Science Foundation (ESF) (Government body)
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK (Government body)
Medical Research Council (MRC), London, UK (Government body)
STROBE group (Consortium)